[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
RE: [dita-fa-edboard] Removing the book hierarchy on DITA Wiki pages
- From: "JoAnn Hackos" <joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com>
- To: "Carol Geyer" <carol.geyer@oasis-open.org>,"DITA Editorial Board" <dita-fa-edboard@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:25:42 -0600
HI Carol,
I'm just back from Europe and catching up on the discussion. I think
inevitably we need to change the architecture. I hope someone has time
to work on it. Unfortunately, I'm swamped.
Thanks for all your hard work on this. Greatly appreciated.
JoAnn
JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services, Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80215
303-232-7586
joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com
joannhackos Skype
www.comtech-serv.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Carol Geyer [mailto:carol.geyer@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 2:02 PM
To: 'DITA Editorial Board'
Subject: [dita-fa-edboard] Removing the book hierarchy on DITA Wiki
pages
DITA XML.org EdBoard:
I've been doing some 'book' and 'sitemap' experimentation since our call
last
week. If the EdBoard feels Drupal's 'book' hierarchical navigation is a
negative feature, we can change it.
I believe the best solution would be to create new 'page' nodes for all
the
current Wiki pages, then delete the current 'book' nodes. 'Page' nodes
don't
support outlining, so users won't be confronted by that 'Parent:' drop
down
menu on the edit page.
Recreating the pages is not hard, just tedious. If we can get a
volunteer or
two to take this on, the conversion can be accomplished fairly quickly.
(I
don't think there's a way to automate this.) I'm happy to work with
someone on
this.
As for the sitemap, we'll either be able to list all wiki pages on the
site map
in alpha order (or by creation date) or just have one link to the main
wiki
outline page (or maybe the main wiki page and the sections).
Are we sure this is what we want to do before we put in the time to make
the
change?
Pros:
-more closely mimic traditional wikis
-one less thing users need to do
-doesn't force users to choose one primary location
-eliminates risk of users putting pages in wrong order
Cons:
-makes sitemap less meaningful
-removes automatic navigation to subpages (links at the bottom of the
parent
pages)
If we are in agreement that ditching the 'book' will add to the site's
usability, then we should do it--now before the site grows larger. What
do you
think?
--Carol
_________________________________
Carol Geyer
Director of Communications
OASIS
+1.978.667.5115 x209
Register now for the Open Standards Forum:
"Enabling Transformational Government Through Web Services and SOA"
29-30 Oct 2007 * London
http://events.oasis-open.org/home/forum/2007
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This publicly archived list is provided by OASIS for the use of the
Editorial
Board of DITA XML.org. Subscription and posting privileges are reserved
for
members of the Editorial Board; others should contact
communications@oasis-open.org for assistance.
[Un]Subscribe: dita-fa-edboard-[un]subscribe@lists.xml.org
List archives: http://lists.xml.org/archives/dita-fa-edboard/
XML.org DITA Focus Area: http://dita.xml.org
Committee homepage: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/dita
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]