xml-dev - Re: XML API specification

[Joe English <jenglish@crl.com>]

Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net> wrote:

> Could we go through the bone of contention up front
> and just settle it:  are grove and grove plan definitions of
> use to an object-oriented API design?  Really just asking here,
> so this gets settled and doesn't crop up again and again.

I think so.  It's very straightforward to translate class
definitions from a grove plan into class definitions in
(Java|C++|Modula-3|OO-language-of-choice).  That's pretty
much what James Clark did for the generic SP interface.

That's a good approach for processing XML-as-XML.  A slightly
different approach is useful when you want to add application
semantics, namely, to create a new class for each element
type of interest, (or better yet, for each architectural form).
That's sort of what SGMLS.pm, the original CoST, and (I think)
Peter M-R's CML tools do.



--Joe English

  jenglish@crl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)