[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Len Bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@arbortext.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 1997 13:10:39 -0600
Eve L. Maler wrote:
>
> I've also been beating the drum on the WG list about how our PIs should
> have "GIs" as well as "attribute specs," so I'd prefer to see <?XML
> stylesheet att1="val1" att2="val2"... ?>. This way, "<?XML" targets the PI
> so that it will be processed by an XML-aware processor, and the rest
> identifies the semantics of the instruction.
This looks weirdly like DTD/instance built into the XML instance.
So, XML then defines an application inside the instance?
I understand it because this is how IADS and IDE/AS did links
originally. However, it created interoperability problems
and does to this day. What is the difference between this
and a tag bag of empty elements included at the top of a DTD?
len
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|