Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Tim Bray <email@example.com>
- To: Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk (Peter Murray-Rust), firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 08:08:26 -0700
>2.1 **Default Attribute Values**. This appears to be a parser requirement
>and I'd be grateful if Norbert and Tim (and any other parser writers) could
>express their views. At present all my test examples are based on explicit
>attributes in the document. Parser development would be highly desirable.
Yes. Lark (and I'm nearly certain NXP) both do default attributes now,
if declared in the internal subset, properly; so there's no need
for those explicit attributes.
>**General point** XML-LINK applies to WF as well as valid documents.
>many things that can produce apparently meaningless documents (e.g. linking
>from one WF|valid document to another WF|valid which might reasonably throw
>errors but the spec has not (yet) commented on these - I hope it will later.
Huh? I don't understand this point at all. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (firstname.lastname@example.org)