Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Peter Newcomb <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 12:20:03 -0400
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 16:57:26 +0200
> From: Norbert Mikula <email@example.com>
> Alex Milowski wrote:
> > The dsssl.grove package is intended to provide standardized programatic access
> > to groves--the result of processing an SGML document. IMHO, it would be ideal
> > if XML processors could produce a grove that a DSSSL processor could use.
> I certainly agree, that a (complete) grove is probably
> the most powerful and complete way of accessing
> a documents data.
> I am not convinced however, that it is always necessary
> to built a grove.
> You can always built a more powerful layer
> on top of an event stream. Furthermore we
> should also consider the work of the DOM
> group. Their results will have a considerable
> impact on our work as well.
> If we can provide a flexible low level
> layer, we can always add more fancy and
> specialized post-processors on top
> of it.
I believe it it is important not only to design the low-level
interface such that a grove (or other-high level interface) can be
implemented on top of it, but also to design the low-level interface
such that _it_ (at least the relevant portions of it: i.e. the event
stream and associated classes) can be implemented on top of a grove
Another concern I have is that the terminology used for the two
interfaces (low and high) be consistent. A programmer who learns one
interface should not have to learn a different vocabulary in order to
use the other. This is also true across languages: a person using
an XML parser in Java should not have to learn a different vocabulary
in order to use an XML parser from C++ or Perl.
As the SGML property set has already been published (in DSSSL, and
soon in the HyTime 2nd Edition) and is in use, I suggest that it be
used as a terminology reference for new SGML and XML interface
Peter Newcomb TechnoTeacher, Inc.
233 Spruce Avenue P.O. Box 23795
Rochester, NY 14611-4041 USA Rochester, New York 14692-3795 USA
+1 716 529 4303 (home) +1 716 464 8696 (direct)
+1 716 755 8698 (cell) +1 716 271 0796 (main)
+1 716 529 4304 (fax) +1 716 271 0129 (fax)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)