Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Peter Newcomb <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 23:21:23 -0400
> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 14:07:06 -0400
> From: Jonathan Robie <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Cc: email@example.com
> At 01:29 PM 6/24/97 -0400, Peter Newcomb wrote:
> >> [Jonathan Robie]
> >> Hmmm. IDL == Language independent spec of an API....might this be
> >> better approached as an XML application? I.e. a DTD for the XML API
> >> spec. A doc conforming to that spec. that can be down-translated to
> >> Java, C++, Python and (gasp) IDL!
> For the record, I didn't say that. Sean McGrath did, quoting my earlier
> message, which went like this:
Sorry about that... I receive CTS as email and had already deleted
your post before I read Sean's post and was moved to write mine. I
got confused by the quoting.
> >Is there really an advantage to defining it in IDL first? The IDL could be
> >created after the specification is finished in Java, and the Java-based
> >specification is probably easier to create, understand, and test. I *like*
> >making things language independent, but at this stage, I'm leery of adding
> >complexity that doesn't add any new conceptual power.
> So not only am I in agreement with the rest of your message, your message
> actually agrees with what I said earlier!
Yes... I had read your post, and meant mine as a second to yours.
Peter Newcomb TechnoTeacher, Inc.
233 Spruce Avenue P.O. Box 23795
Rochester, NY 14611-4041 USA Rochester, New York 14692-3795 USA
+1 716 529 4303 (home) +1 716 464 8696 (direct)
+1 716 755 8698 (cell) +1 716 271 0796 (main)
+1 716 529 4304 (fax) +1 716 271 0129 (fax)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (email@example.com)
- Re: XAPI
- From: Jonathan Robie <firstname.lastname@example.org>