[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk (Peter Murray-Rust)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 16:12:53 GMT
In message <199708051317.XAA23619@jawa.chilli.net.au> "Rick Jelliffe" writes:
[...]
>
> I suggest that the following approach should be taken. (I think it is the only
> realistic solution, especially if we assume that 1)
> data is usually generated by applications,
Although this will be partly true, I think we still have to expect people
to use text editors for a year or two yet :-). [It's how I create most of
my XML at present :-)].
> 2) humans only check and tweak data;
Yes. XML must certainly be tweakable. So it mustn't have to have lines 1000
chars long :-)
> 3) we want operating system
> and character set independence,
critical :-)
4) line-breaking is generally done by clients
> ...so CR/LF is basically a convenience for fitting data into editors,
> not for the purposes of output.)
Yes.
>
> **A) XML applications should ignore *ALL* CR and LF as a bad joke. They should
> be entirely there for formatting the raw text into nice, eye-sized records.
> So CR and LF should never be converted to spaces. (This approach was the
> one taken by Interleaf, and I have come to appreciate it.) If you need a
> space, then start the new line with it! (Ending the previous line is difficult
> to see.)
Appeals to me :-)
>
> **B) XML applications should mandate the use of the unambiguous Unicode characters
> -- LINE SEPARATOR 

> -- PARAGRAPH SEPARATOR 

>
This makes sense unless someone finds a flaw in it...
P.
--
Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection
Virtual School of Molecular Sciences
http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|