[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@iol.ie>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 1997 15:26:25 +0100
>At 1:07 PM -0500 8/25/97, Sean Mc Grath wrote:
>>[Liam Quin]
>>>If this happens, it wlil be time to standardise whitespace handling at the
>>>applicaton level, perhaps. Right now, I fnd this argument totally bogus.
>>
>>What are you saying? Lets wait and see if the horse bolts - if he
>>does we will lock the barn door?
>
>This is a lovely example of how quoting out of context can replace giving a
>counter-argument. Here's the _substantive_ part of Liam's note:
[David Durand]
My counter argument (not reproduced above) *followed* the sentence you *have*
reproduced. A lovely example of how quoting....
Here is a concrete scenario that either illustrates the problem or
illustrates my ignorance.
I want to know how two XML applications that apply different
WS conventions can inter-operate losslessly. Specifically, why is this
scenario wrong? :-
I wish to perform a null transformation across two editing tools App A and
App B.
foo.xml --> App A --> App B --> bar.xml
I want foo.xml == bar.xml
App A : reads foo.xml and treats WS according to APPA-WS-RULES
writes temp.xml
App B : reads temp.xml and treats WS according to APPB-WS-RULES
writes bar.xml
Result : foo1.xml != bar.xml
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|