[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: digitome@iol.ie (Sean Mc Grath)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 09:44:33 +0100
[From Jon Bosak]
> 3. Discussion of the proposition that the XML spec should say
> more about what the processor passes the App. John Tigue has
> volunteered to write an XML Grove Plan; while there is little
> sentiment that this should be made normative, it might serve
> usefully as either a separate application note or an appendix.
I raised this issue a long time ago and I am delighted to see it is being
considered for inclusion in XML. Having a grove plan gives developers
a sanity checker for their parsers. Having a grove plan with a syntactic form
that can be output from a parsers internal tree representation provides a
mechanism
for testing and comparing parsers. Having a grove plan allows apps to be
developed
that process post-parse data-structures as opposed to using an API.
>From my perspective the importance of this merits normative inclusion
in the spec. I am reminded of that well thumbed quintet of pages in
8879. Annex G of appendix B, attatchement 1. Otherwise known as ESIS -
the starting point for many an SGML structure controlled application.
Sean Mc Grath
sean@digitome.com
Digitome Electronic Publishing
http://www.digitome.com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|