[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Michael Leventhal <michael@textscience.com>
- To: "XML DEV" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 08:02:38 +0200
At 09:46 AM 9/29/97 -0400, Paul Madsen wrote:
>But what does this gain us? What deficiencies with the DTD formalism does it
>address?
>
>Is it the ability to extend object types so that one class of object is a
>specialization of another more general class?
IMHO, this is a strong reason to chuck DTDs as they now exist. But not
a goal of XML-DATA.
>Do not Architectural forms provide the traditional DTD syntax just that
>ability?
So say some but not really.
Michael Leventhal
______________________________________________________________________
Michael Leventhal Internet : http://www.grif.com
G R I F , S. A. Email : Michael.Leventhal@grif.fr
VP, Technology Telephone : 510-444-2962
1800 Lake Shore Ave Ste 14 Fax : 510-444-1672
Oakland, California 94606 France : (011) 33 1 30121430 (fr US)
______________________________________________________________________
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
