[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- To: Rob McDougall <RMcDouga@JetForm.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 18:40:27 -0500
Rob McDougall wrote:
>
> If I remember correctly, the advantages are listed in the spec. The main
> advantage being that you can include the XML-Data definition within the XML
> file itself, so that you now can send a completely self-describing file
> that can be read by a single (XML) parser.
>
> Rob
>
Umm... You can include an SGML Declaration, DTD and instance in a
single file and it is a completely self-describing file read by a
single parser. I don't think that is the advantage of the Microsoft
approach. I think you can do it with a simpler parser; however, the
tradeoff is a harder to read schema, so a single parser writer (or
several) gain on a few hours of effort but the user of the schema
loses. If that *is* the tradeoff, it isn't much of a bargain.
len bullard
ips
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|