Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Peter Newcomb <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 09:56:46 -0400
[Sean Mc Grath <firstname.lastname@example.org> on Sat, 04 Oct 1997 09:22:25 +0100]
> However, if developers implemented DTDs via a transformation to XML-Data.....
> The XML world would then have the freedom to create
> new and better syntaxes for schemata safe in the knowledge that
> todays tools that can process XML will process these new syntactic
> sugars via transformation to base XML - the mother of all syntaxes.
This idea has always been attractive to me; it seems to give everyone
the flexibility they want, without imposing unnecessary restrictions.
However, unless the transformations are extremely well-designed, XML
DTDs generated in this way are not likely to be particularly
human-readable (one of the arguments for keeping XML DTDs to begin
I don't see this as a reason not to use this scheme, I just think that
the transformations should be well thought out and well documented,
and should have the readability of the generated DTDs as a requirement
from the outset.
Peter Newcomb TechnoTeacher, Inc.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)