Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:49:59 -0400
> How do we stop the authors actually using <inline> and <block> which
> have little meaning as they are? Do we need a "pure virtual" syntax
> which indicates that an element type cannot be instantiated in the
Yes, in my essay I introduce a <!CLASS ...> declaration ro abstract
> Either way, I like this idea a lot. Does the instance syntax proposal for
> XML take any of this into account? If so, I might be converted, on the
> assumption that this type of thing won't make it into the SGML revision.
Well I think that something inheritance-like is going into the revision.
We just have to push for it to be straightforward and "first-class"
rather than indirected as archforms are.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)