Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Sean Mc Grath)
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 1997 09:48:39 +0100
>W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> Peter has run head-on into one of the fundamental problems with DTDs as
>> currently defined by SGML (and XML): we want them to describe *classes* of
>> documents when they actually describe *individual* documents (and are
>> incapable of defining classes of documents except in very weak ways).
SGML establishes a one-to-one relationship between markup and DTD.
The instance - directly or indirectly - *names* its DTD.
However, a given instance can be gainfully parsed w.r.t.
many DTDs to achieve different effects - weakening contraints is one of
To do this involves specifying at parse time - rather that at authoring time -
what DTD to use for the parse.
HyTime allows parsing w.r.t. a meta-DTD via HyTime aware parsers. However,
I think there are many occasions when there is nothing "meta" involved. Just
a desire to parse w.r.t to an alternative schema. Not a meta-schema - just
a different schema.
Sean Mc Grath
Digitome Electronic Publishing
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)