[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 1997 18:11:57 +0100
Richard Tobin wrote:
>I don't see how that excludes my example. The tags and elements *do*
>begin and end in the same entity.
Sorry, the sentence "it may end in a different entity from the one it
started in" "tricked" me into not reading your example fully, I thought I
saw "a</b>c" and not "a<b/>c" (as you stated).
>(suppose foo is defined as "a<b/>c";
>then the first bit returned from "x&foo;y" is "xa".
Ok. My current design will first return PCData="x", then entity ref="foo",
and (if the client want entities expanded: PCData="a" followed by
EmptyElement="b" and then PCData="c".)
ie it may return two consecutive PCData's, with perhaps some
EntityExpansionStart and -End signals between them.
(Is this design flawed?)
Cheers,
Jarle
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|