Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Joe Lapp <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 12:17:06 -0500
"Martin Bryan" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>This presumes that the "document" is the thing you want to remove. What if:
>a) the document was built from a set of entities?
>b) only part of the document consisted of updatable data fields?
>The key factor is "what proportion of the data needs to be modified?"
I think I've just discovered that we are both arguing for the same
thing. My point is exactly that the _document_ is not the smallest
unit we care to change. I just meant to point out that because we
care for finer granularity, and because currently no standard exists
for updating at arbitrary granularity, we need a standard. I was
giving an example with XSL only to demonstrate that XSL does not
itself provide us with a way to work at that granularity. Currently,
using XSL alone, we'd be replacing the entire document -- which is
exactly what we _do_not_ want to do.
>The XML/EDI crew will be looking into this problem as it is key to running
>an electronic business using XML.
I am preparing a report on what I believe is the fundamental
issue, and I hope to post it before the day is out.
>Why not join the XML/EDI research teams (see http://www.xmledi.net for
I'll look into it as soon as I finish this report.
Joe Lapp (Java Apps Developer/Consultant)
Unite for Java! - http://www.javalobby.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)