[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@mindspring.com>
- To: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 21:06:12 -0500
At 12:53 PM 11/21/97 +1100, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
>
>
>> From: Jonathan Robie <jwrobie@mindspring.com>
>
>> The following properties of object models are easily represented in SGML/XML:
>>
>> o Identity
>> o State
>> o Type
>>
>> These properties are not easily represented:
>>
>> o Behavior (except for in languages that allow methods to be
>> represented as data, e.g. Java)
>> o Encapsulation constraints
>
>I think you miss what is perhaps *THE* most important thing that SGML content
>models represent: sequence.
>
>This is one of the essential distinguishing features of SGML.
The purpose of my message was to describe what SGML/XML-based interfaces to
object systems can represent, not to propose that SGML/XML should have the
same inheritance mechanisms as object oriented systems. Whether or not they
should, I think it is pretty clear that they don't.
Jonathan
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
