Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 03:47:21 -0500
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> Sticking angle brackets on troff code may give you a document that is
> syntactically *valid* SGML but, because to the extent that it uses elements
> to markup processing instructions, the document does not *conform* to
> SGML. Such conformance cannot be judged mechanically, but by looking at the
> definitions in ISO 8879 for processing instructions and elements.
"Element: A component of the hierarchical structure defined by a
document type definition;"
> People often seem to think "SGML is a grammar; I can markup all sorts of
> sloppy things; therefore SGML is a bad grammar".
I would have thought that that flexibility makes SGML a *good* grammar.
SGML would be a GOOD encoding for (e.g.) a typesetting language. In
fact, it already is used in this way for SPDL.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)