xml-dev - Re: XML application

Re: XML application

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]

From: james anderson <mecom-gmbh@mixx.de>
To: Ingo Macherius <Ingo.Macherius@TU-Clausthal.de>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 1997 11:44:29 +0100

how about
<?XML version="1.0" ?>

i've yet to understand why, but isn't that the way it needs to be?

Ingo Macherius wrote:

> > <http://www.scripting.com/siteChanges.xml>
> It is not valid XML, because of 3 things:
More exact: It is neither well-formed nor valid XML ...
> 1) the <?XML version="1.0"> PI is missing.
Ouch. This is not well-formed at all.
Use <?xml version="1.0"> as to the latest PR.
++im

Follow-Ups:
- LISTRIVIA (was Re: XML application)
  - From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- Re: XML application
  - From: "Ingo Macherius" <Ingo.Macherius@TU-Clausthal.de>

References:
- XML application
  - From: "Meltsner, Kenneth J" <Kenneth.J.Meltsner@jci.com>
- Re: XML application
  - From: "Ingo Macherius" <Ingo.Macherius@TU-Clausthal.de>

Prev by Date: Any XSL tool!
Next by Date: Re: XML application
Previous by thread: Re: XML application
Next by thread: Re: XML application
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread