Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Paul Prescod <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: xml-dev <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 09:15:39 -0500
David Megginson wrote:
> The advantage is that the same XmlApplication object can work with
> more than one XmlProcessor at the same time (though it is not required
> to be able to do so).
If you use the name "Application" then it makes sense to require a
single application to support multiple processors. Jade is an example of
an application that supports multiple processors. If we use the word
***Consumer, then it makes sense that there should be a single consumer
> > This could be done by having the app ask the processor for the location
> > of the last event in some non-standardized way, but that's kind of
> > kludgy. On the other hand, maybe this is just too fancy for a
> > "simple" API.
> I think that it probably is too fancy.
Maybe, but it also seems very important. A processor that can't tell you
where your errors are is very frustrating. Perhaps there should
immediately be a "level 2" that supports this.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)