[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 10:33:08 -0800
At 09:38 PM 16/12/97 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>After careful thought, I am fairly certain that I would be willing to
>accept the following simple event-driven API for Ælfred.
I'd be willing to commit to signing up to do this for Lark, given
the following changes:
> public void
> startDocument (XmlProcessor processor, String pubid, URL sysid);
Question: what if there's no <!DOCTYPE? And if there is, you might as
well throw in the root doctype.
> public void
> startProlog (XmlProcessor processor);
> public void
> endProlog (XmlProcessor processor);
Lose these; they have no place in this API. You want this kind of stuff,
use Lark or AElfred or whatever.
> public void
> processingInstruction (XmlProcessor processor, String target, String data);
Lose this.
> public void
> error (XmlProcessor processor, String message, URL url, int line);
>}
Have to add the entity ID as an argument. No point giving the line
number if you don't know what it's in.
>The processor itself could implement the following interface (very
>Thread-oriented and Bean-like):
And one last thing: if you use URL, then you have to do a new URL()
which does (I think) at least some syntax checking... is this appropriate?
Why not just pass it as a string? -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|