[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 21:19:49
At 10:35 17/12/97 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>
>Oops; and I forgot the IMPORTANT one: I don't see any point in doing
>this if there isn't also an ultra-simple tree interface supporting
>only Element, Attribute, and Text classes. Because this is what most
>people will use, especially given that a high proportion of XML
>transmissions will be small flattish documents; why should everyone
>have to build their own tree. -Tim
Yes - this is really important, because it fixes the terminology. We also
know whether we have a Vector of children or some other model.
P.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
