OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   RE: IDL?

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
  • To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
  • Date: Wed, 24 Dec 1997 16:44:57 -0800

I have to agree with Paul here.  If the interface is only implementable in a
single language, then you've failed.  Programmers need to make engineering
tradeoffs among a number of factors, and will sometimes very reasonably
choose one language over another.  We could expediently pick one language
and ignore all others in order to simplify the problem a little, but that
would be letting the solution dictate the problem. I don't recommend it,
since it would simply mean that the parsers written in other languages would
be guaranteed incompatible.

--Andrew Layman
   AndrewL@microsoft.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Paul Prescod [SMTP:papresco@technologist.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, December 17, 1997 12:30 PM
> To:	xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
> Subject:	Re: IDL?
> 
> Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> > 
> > The interface has to be simple enough for people like me to understand
> and
> > to tell my friends what it's about. I would prefer to limit the
> Consumers,
> > Factories and the rest to as few as possible.
> 
> An IDL interface implies no extra complication in the Java interface. It
> merely describes the Java interface in terms that are more universal
> than Java itself -- it is like a DTD for interfaces. So far nobody has
> yet proposed anything that would make an IDL description impossible. All
> I ask is that:
> 
> a) nobody do so later (e.g. require runtime lookup of Java class objects
> or do something simiarly brain-dead) and 
> 
> b) implementations in other languages be considered "successes" in terms
> of the success/failure of this project.
> 
> I don't think that either of these constraints endanger the success of
> the Java-specific part of the project or make the Java-specific part
> more difficult.
>  
>  Paul Prescod
> 
> 
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
> To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
> (un)subscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
> message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: IDL?
      • From: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>
    • RE: IDL?
      • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>



 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS