[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 04 Jan 1998 16:45:04
At 10:11 04/01/98 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
[... NOTATION example snipped...]
>
>SAX will simply report that the attribute "object" has the value
>"clip", without worrying that there is a notation called "video";
>however, Ælfred, for example, will let you look up the type of
>"object", find out that it's an entity, look up the associated
>notation, and then get the notation's system identifier.
This looks very reasonable to me.
Should SAX report (or be prepared to report) that it has found documents
components and skipped them? It must carry out some minimal parsing of the
bits it ignores - perhaps "ignorable DTD".
P.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
http://www.venus.co.uk/vhg
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
