[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Sean Mc Grath <digitome@iol.ie>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 23:40:05 GMT
>
>The alternative is to return to what I had originally done with
>Ælfred, and generate a separate event for each attribute:
>
> public void attribute (String elementName, String aname, String value);
>
Separate attribute events raises a question.
Unlike SGML, XML does not specify that the order in which attribute values
are supplied in a start-tag is insignificant to applications.
(Perhaps I missed something it in the spec.?). A processor working
sans DTD obviously cannot determine a declaration order in which to generate
the events.
Annex G of the SGML handbook just says the order is insignificant. However,
nsgmls ESIS supplies then in declaration order and I for one have written
apps that relied on that. Perhaps writing apps that rely on a specific
order of attribute event arrival is just plain bad design!
Anyway, the dictionary approach, supplying all the attributes in one go
side-steps buffering and state space for simple little SAX apps. that want
to pick
up attributes X and Y of element Z and nothing else.
While on this subject, what comes first, a start-tag event or its attribute
event(s)?
Sean Mc Grath
sean at digitome dot com
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|