[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: james anderson <mecom-gmbh@mixx.de>
- To: "xml-dev@ic.ac.uk" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 17:02:59 +0100
Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> I think that newcomers to XML may read more magic processing into this than
> exists. In the example given, an XML parser will see TWO declared
you can count me among them...
> elementTypes (x and y). There is no declaration of one::x, two::x,
> two::one::x. Indeed if the document were given to a validating parser this
> would presumably report that "one::x has not been declared".
> ...
>
> If I have this right, it's important to realise that parsers have nothing
> to do with namespaces, and that any namespace handling is application
> dependent. If the WG or others come up with namespace proposals, I would
> expect them to be implemented elsewhere than the parser.
'cause i coundn't figure out how i was supposed to have the parser validate
documents which
incorporated difference namespaces without supporting it identifying elements
according to namespace-qualified names...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|