[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Jeremie Miller" <jeremie@netins.net>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 1998 01:38:55 -0600
> [paragraphs removed]
>
>So you have the following choice:
> - encode the *whole* spec (and nothing but the spec - i.e. no tricky
>non-compliant extensions) and give yourself the label "conforming XML
tool".
> - encode the bits you feel are cost effective and label it "processes most
>XML documents, but gives 'Sorry' messages for some".
More questions/issues then:
A well-formed XML document is not required to have a DTD, internal or
external, correct? Is a well-formed parser not an XML parser that does not
have access to or does not process a DTD, internal or external? I guess I
haven't found a clear definition of what a well-formed parser is yet.
If this is true, then a well-formed parser doesn't even have to acknowledge
that entities exist except for the built in ones, and absolutely all
whitespace is preserved, right?
Thanks,
Jeremie Miller
jer@jeremie.com
http://www.jeremie.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
