[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 1998 15:47:47 +0700
Tim Bray wrote:
> No. The spec is clear; a non-validating processor is required to
> do internal entities and default attribute values. Nobody should
> expect one to do anything with notations or unparsed entities or
> anything else. You want that, get a validating processor.
I think I would expect a non-validating processor to inform the
application about any unparsed entities that have been declared in the
internal subset. A non-validating processor has to keep track of this,
because it has to report an error if any of them are referenced. I don't
see that passing this information on to the application has anything to
do with validation.
The only things I expect of a validating processor that I don't expect
of a non-validating processor are:
- processing the external DTD subset
- processing parameter entity references
- reporting violations of validity constraints
- reporting that character data is ignorable white space
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|