[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Stefan Mintert <sm@irb.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 14:40:32 +0100
Hi!
Production [52] of the XML spec reads
AttlistDecl ::= '<!ATTLIST' S Name AttDef* S? '>'
A legal AttlistDecl would be
<!ATTLIST>
What's the purpose of an empty AttlistDecl?
Shouldn't production [52] read instead as follows?
AttlistDecl ::= '<!ATTLIST' S Name AttDef+ S? '>'
(+ instead of *)
Why was a "Possibly empty attribute definition list" (K.4.4.1,
[142], ISO 8879 TC 2, http://www.sgmlsource.com/8879rev/n1955.htm)
introduced in SGML with the latest revision?
Thanks in advance for any answer!
Bye,
Stefan.
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
Stefan Mintert
UniDo: mintert@irb.informatik.uni-dortmund.de
private: stefan@mintert.com
WWW: http://www.informatik.uni-dortmund.de/~sm/
+-----------------------------------------------------------+
"let the music keep our spirits high..."
(Jackson Browne)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|