[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Michael Kay" <M.H.Kay@eng.icl.co.uk>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 14:35:27 -0000
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Lapp <jlapp@webmethods.com>
To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
Date: 29 January 1998 22:07
Subject: Extending DTDs for Backward Compatibility
>I need to create DTDs that are extensible...
I've got the same problem: I essentially want a "standard" DTD
for an application domain that tolerates private extensions added
by individual implementors.
I had thought of doing it with something like
<PRIVATE TAG="mytag">XXX</PRIVATE>; this
has the advantage it flags it up as a private extension, but
it's certainly ugly in other ways. Fortunately I'm not using
attributes extensively, it's only private elements I'm really
concerned with.
Mike Kay
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
