[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
- To: xml-dev Mailing List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 09:36:17 +0700
David Megginson wrote:
> * Both Byte and Character streams
>
> Pro: - keeps everyone happy
>
> Con: - requires more interfaces
> - requires another method in the Parser interface
> - requires a new SAX class encapsulating a ByteStream and its
> recommended encoding (or perhaps the ByteStream interface
> will have a getEncoding() method)
> - will greatly complicate the EntityResolver mechanism (the
> application will need to be able to return a byte stream _or_
> a character stream -- how could I handle this?)
You could just have a class that encapsulates a structure with three
members:
- a CharacterStream
- a ByteStream
- a String
At least one of the CharacterStream and ByteStream must be non-null. If
the ByteStream is non-null the String can specify the encoding.
James
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|