[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: David Megginson <ak117@freenet.carleton.ca>,Xml-Dev List <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 1998 09:49:24 -0700
At 09:00 PM 4/17/98 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>Should SAX level 1 allow parsers to report implied attributes by
>providing null for AttributeList.getValue() (it does not currently do
>so)? The only application I can think of right now is architectural
>forms, where an implied attribute can prevent automatic derivation.
Nothing in the XML spec suggests that anything should be done about
#IMPLIED-but-absent attributes... there was such language but we
deliberately took it out. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
