Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Lars Marius Garshol <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 09:23:09 +0200
Eve L. Maler wrote:
> I hope you'll share future news of your implementation as
> you go along.
With pleasure. :)
I'll post again with more information and feedback, when I've got enough
it covered to make a release.
> It was decided to add this back in December. However, several WG members
> have since had a change of heart. So I have a feeling that it may not
That would make at least one XML hacker slightly happier.
> My own belief is that having the "string" location term is sufficient, and
> sufficiently robust, to do any addressing you'd want to do into a CDATA
That's a belief I share.
> If we do want to allow addressing into some construct that the DOM doesn't
> support, it's incumbent on the XLink side to request new functionality from
> the DOM folks.
Then I see something that seems highly important: a method in the
interface for returning the element with a given ID. Something like
Element getElementWithID(in wstring id);
You've very likely already thought of and discussed this, so it would be
nice to hear what is likely to happen in this area. (I could subclass
Document object and the DOM builder in the Python DOM implementation to
this information, but it seems pointless if the DOM is going to include
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)