Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Chris Maden <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Fri, 8 May 1998 14:10:05 -0400 (EDT)
> In the section on autodetection of character encodings the XML spec
> states "00 3C 00 3F: UTF-16, big-endian, no Byte Order Mark (and
> thus, strictly speaking, in error)"
> My question is, why is this an error rather than a perfectly
> acceptable untransformed UCS-2 document?
The XML spec states, by fiat, in 4.3.3, that "Entities encoded in
UTF-16 must begin with the Byte Order Mark". So the reason the
example is an error is because the spec says so.
UCS-2 is identical to UTF-16, and so it is subject (presumably) to the
As a side note, I was unsure until just now whether they were
equivalent, but I finally found ISO 10646-1 clause 8:
Plane 00 of Group 00 shall be the Basic Multilingual Plane (BMP).
The BMP can be used as a two-octet coded character set in which
case it shall be called UCS-2.
Linkname: ISO/IEC 10646-1 including AMD 1 thru 4
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)