[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
- To: "XML Developers' List" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: 18 May 1998 17:39:31 +0200
* Philippe Le Hégaret
|
| charecters takes an array of characters for the data :
|
| public abstract void characters(char ch[],
| int start,
| int length) throws SAXException
|
| processingInstruction takes a String for the data :
|
| public abstract void processingInstruction(String target,
| String data) throws SAXException
|
| Why is there this difference in SAX ?
I wasn't "present" when this decision was made, but I'd guess
characters is the way it is because this way is faster in most
implementations, since most parsers keep a character buffer during
parsing and this avoids unecessary buffer copying.
However, doing it this way is obviously less convenient for the user,
who would prefer to just get a String and be done with it. I guess
this is why the current form of processingInstruction was chosen,
since processing instructions rarely occur often in documents and thus
performance is less of an issue.
See also:
<URL:http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9801/0042.html>
<URL:http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/9801/0087.html>
--
"These are, as I began, cumbersome ways / to kill a man. Simpler, direct,
and much more neat / is to see that he is living somewhere in the middle /
of the twentieth century, and leave him there." -- Edwin Brock
http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~larsga/ http://birk105.studby.uio.no/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|