Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Chris Maden <email@example.com>
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Date: Wed, 20 May 1998 13:26:05 -0400 (EDT)
[John E. Simpson]
> From previous (sometimes contentious) discussions on this list, I
> gather that there's no provision in SAX for passing document <!--
> comments --> to a downstream application.
> The XPointer WD, production 12, allows for relative addressing by
> node type (element, PI, and so on), *including* comments.
> Does the downstream invisibility of comments imply that a URL like
> this will always fail?
> Thanks for any insights,
Insight: XML != SAX.
A purely SAX implementation will not see comments, so an XPointer
implementation based on it will fail with that pointer.
However, a different XML parser may still have the comments, and an
XPointer based on it may well find them. A complete XPointer
implementation would need to have access to the comments, though I'm
not entirely sure what the purpose would be (except possibly for
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)