Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@classic.msn.com>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 25 May 98 00:53:50 UT
I've divided this response into two pieces. This one addresses process and
>I think that this project should envision that there may well be an
>orthogonal XML-type activity of some sort and should make sure that nothing
>undermines this possibility.
I completely agree - I'd like to make this proposal a possible foundation for
such an activity, but don't want it to get in the way of other activities.
>I'd recommend starting with those aspects of the
>DTD that survive the normalisation process. This would mean that
>distinction between the internal/external DTDs would not be included, nor
I agree. I think the processes involved in normalization can be addressed
later and separately. Many of them are important for usage, but they're not
the place to start.
>After further elucidation from EliotK last week, it became clear that I
>have failed to understand external entities. (I had not understood the
>purpose and difference of NDATA.) I would urge that we start without a
>complete spectrum of entities since I suspect they will be difficult.
>Another way of tackling it is to suggest that we manage those components
>which are most relevant to SAX (ELEMENTs and ATTRIBUTEs and some aspects of
>ENTITYs). IOW 'what does a SAX user want from DTD information'?
Elements and attributes are definitely my focus. Entities pose some other
problems. Paul Prescod has suggested rather strongly that entities actually
belong in a separate notation. This is worth considering, though a somewhat
>XML-data seemed to have three components:
> - a type-ing proposal (integer, etc.)
> - a DTD representation (STAR, ONEORMORE, etc.)
> - relations
>In my simple mind I could see these being disassembled into three separate
>components. I would see the middle one as equivalent to what we are doing
>and therefore the most fundamental (or at least the first we have to tackle).
The middle is definitely the target here, a much smaller target.
>Perhaps David could
>give a very brief overview of any organisational problems Simon will hit.
I would definitely appreciate this.
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)