[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Ron Bourret)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 14:39:52 +0200
James Tauber wrote:
> > I also like this, as long as we get the plurality right. Each document
> > will have multiple type definitions within it. So it makes sense to say
> > "here's my XTD document", but not "here's my XTD" (which would imply a
> > single definition).
>
> This is an important point. An XTD is like a markup declaration. An XTD
> document is a collection of XTDs. It encourages the modularity of the
> declarations.
From long experience writing documentation and trying to influence the terms and
slang people use, I can tell you that the difference between "XTDs" and "XTD"
will quickly be lost. .xtd is too convenient as a file extension and will
quickly come to mean the whole thing.
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|