[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "John E. Simpson" <simpson@polaris.net>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 18:25:50 -0400
At 03:04 PM 5/28/98 -0700, Andrew Layman wrote:
[a useful interpretation of metadata
... building on a useful message posted by Peter Murray-Rust
posted Thursday, May 28, 1998 3:43 PM
... in turn building on a useful message posted by Tim Bray
posted 11:33 28/05/98 -0700]
Well, now I'm confused about something... are the metadata in these XSchema
documents, as covered by the XSD proposed goals, to be metadata describing
the SDDs (or whatever they're finally called) themselves, OR metadata that
will describe the generated DTD? Or both?
For instance, the SDD might include metadata such as date of creation,
author, and so on; the generated DTD might incorporate all that, taken
directly from the SDD, AND add to it something along the lines of
"DTDGENERATOR='SSD2DTD VERSION 1.0' GENERATEDDATE='19980618'".
Does it make a difference which of these metadata the XSD proposal addresses?
John E. Simpson | It's no disgrace t'be poor,
simpson@polaris.net | but it might as well be.
| -- "Kin" Hubbard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|