[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@classic.msn.com>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 30 May 98 16:41:10 UT
In some of Peter's latest examples, he's used 'traditional' general entities.
I like the results, but don't know that this belongs in the official spec.
Question:
Should the use of traditional DTD entity (and other) notation be encouraged in
the design, development, and use of XSchemas?
-------------------
Keep in mind that XSchema 1.0 is not itself providing entity services.
I think in the long run, entity services will be provided by a non-XSchema and
non-DTD mechanism. For now, though, we need to be able to interoperate. Peter
suggested a separate 'note' - I think this is a good idea.
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|