Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Lars Marius Garshol <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: <email@example.com>
- Date: 30 May 1998 20:42:07 +0200
* Tim Bray
| I kind of think that the thing people have in mind in this group
| when they say "schema" is "expressions of syntactic constraints
| which can be verified mechanically" or some such.
* James K. Tauber
| So is a schema a function that maps a document to a truth value?
I'd rather say that it is a definition of a set of documents, just as
a formal language is usually considered to be the set of sentences
that are well-formed in that language.
The software that verifies a document could be called "a function that
maps a document to a truth value", though. Mathematically, such
software would perform an "element of"-test on the set of documents
defined by the schema.
"These are, as I began, cumbersome ways / to kill a man. Simpler, direct,
and much more neat / is to see that he is living somewhere in the middle /
of the twentieth century, and leave him there." -- Edwin Brock
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:email@example.com)