xml-dev - RE: Roots of the DTD

["Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@classic.msn.com>]

>I don't like telling people they can use DOCTYPE or XSchema PIs but not both. 
 I 
>also don't like having to write a long list of conflict resolutions -- it 
just 
>makes XSchemas harder to use.  In both cases, it feels like we are imposing 
>requirements not in the XML spec.  Ideas?

Perhaps the simplest way to deal with this is to leave roots _out_ of the 
XSchema PI. I always thought it was kind of silly to declare it in DOCTYPE - 
after all, the root element should be the first and last thing you see in a 
document, and an application should be able to figure it out.  It seems to me 
like redundancy, though there may be reasons for it which I haven't fathomed.

The other reason for ignoring roots is that we _can't_ change DOCTYPE, so I 
think we'd better just stay out of its way.

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)