[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Chris Maden <crism@oreilly.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 11:22:57 -0400 (EDT)
[Simon St.Laurent]
> Do you mean that the namespace prefix XSC is redundant?
Yes.
> (I agree it probably is, though the namespaces spec uses QName in
> ATTLIST declarations.)
There was a lot of debate about that. The rationale for allowing
QName for attribute names is that some attributes are globally
applicable - like xml:lang. But an attribute that is inherently bound
to its element type (which I would maintain that the id is, at least
in this case), the namespace prefix is both redundant and confusing.
-Chris
--
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
"<URL>http://www.oreilly.com/people/staff/crism/ <TEL>+1.617.499.7487
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
