[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@classic.msn.com>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 98 12:56:48 UT
The chorus has spoken:
>> > In aid of this, I am PROPOSING that we not use any ID attributes
>> > in XSchema 1.0; change the "id ID #REQUIRED" attributes in ElementDecl
>> > elements to "name NMTOKEN #REQUIRED" instead. That will allow us
>> > to reserved XML IDs for structure-sharing.
>>
>> I like this idea.
>
>Ditto. It looks like the XSchema app is going to have to do half the work
>anyway, so there's no point in limiting ourselves with IDs.
I'll make the change. I think this opens up XSchema dramatically, making
possible and eventually compatible the currently-proposed nested model, Paul's
rule based model, and several of the ideas I've seen for re-creating parameter
entities.
The key in my mind remains making the declarations referenceable; the rest we
can handle in successive specifications as needed. I think we have a great
start here.
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
