[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jarle Stabell <jarle.stabell@dokpro.uio.no>
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 20:37:19 +0200
(Sorry if this already has been discussed)
I think it is unecessary confusing to have both of the pairs
('Required', 'Optional')
and
('Required', 'Implied')
in the XSchema vocabulary.
>Choice (Frequency ("Required", "Optional", "ZeroOrMore", "OneOrMore"))
>Seq (Frequency ("Required", "Optional", "ZeroOrMore", "OneOrMore"))
>Ref (Element, Frequency ("Required", "Optional", "ZeroOrMore", "OneOrMore"))
...
>Required
>Implied
I know that 'Implied' is what is used within DTDs, but personally I find
'Optional' to be much more "to the point", I find 'Implied' quite
"mysterious".
Cheers,
Jarle Stabell
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
