[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Ron Bourret)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 20:42:16 +0200
John Cowan wrote:
> What does "valid" mean here? If it has its technical XML sense, thenn no,
> the document instance will be valid staring from any root as long as
> you mention that element in the DOCTYPE declaration.
>
> If you mean that some later-stage application will barf unless it sees a
> specific root, then you may be right.
I meant the barfing semantics. Valid was clearly a poor choice of words.
-- Ron
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
