Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: Steven Champeon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: John Cowan <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 19:30:44 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, John Cowan wrote:
> > Are you assuming that the XML parser should be able to analyze the
> > logfiles and produce reports on them as well? Seems like a lot to
> > ask of a parser...
> No, I simply meant that such an application shouldn't have to
> parse PCDATA content to make very ordinary and reasonable
> discriminations. PCDATA should be reserved for text strings
> meaningful only to human beings. We already have to have an
> XML parser in every XLF analyzer, that's a given. But there
> shouldn't have to be any other kind of parser too.
OK, that makes sense. We share HOs.
> Let 'em use on-the-fly gzipping and gunzipping, then. Layering
> that over a generator or a parser is very easy.
Fair enough, provided it doesn't place undue load on an already
"All the good geek things, | firstname.lastname@example.org
only without all the | http://a.jaundicedeye.com
bad geek things." | http://hesketh.com/schampeo/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)