[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: rbourret@dvs1.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de (Ron Bourret)
- To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
- Date: Sun, 19 Jul 1998 11:58:28 +0200
> I think the remaining one might be useful (or possibly already discussed
> here). I have been using some JavaDoc-like comments in my XML-Data
> definitions to automatically generate HTML documentation for the document
> content. I have had my XML-Data to DTD converter modified to produce the
> HTML documentation at the same time as it builds the DTD.
>
> I haven't been making a distinction between regular comments and processed
> comments and have only been using @see and @example formulations. Between
> minimal comments and information in the schema, it is able to do a
> reasonably good job documenting how to use the schema.
>
> Has any body else been doing anything in this area?
XSchema does something similar. Most elements contain an optional Doc element
which, in turn, contains a subset of HTML: John Cowan's Itsy Bitsy Teeny Weeny
Simple Hypertext (IBTWSH) format ( http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/ibtwsh.dtd )
See section 2.6.1 of the spec
(http://members.aol.com/simonstl/xschema/spec/xscspec2p6v3.htm)
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|