OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Publishing on XML-DEV (was Re: XCatalog proposal draft 0.1 [From Murray

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
  • To: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
  • Date: Sat, 25 Jul 1998 20:25:04

At 14:39 25/07/98, [Murray Altheim] wrote:
>>> I propose something one week, rough consensus emerges the next
>>> week, and working code a week or two later: such is the Internet
>>> freeware development community.  Peace, it's wonderful!
>>John, this is no criticism of the proposal itself, but 'rough consensus'
>>requires that you have participation. Because this mailing list is not
>>part of any recognized standards activity, there is no procedural method 
>>for creating standards, nor is there any obligation for either comment 
>>or recognition of anything that occurs on this list from its participants.

Over the last few days I have been thinking about whether there should be a
mechanism for the formal 'publishing' ideas and implementations from
XML-DEV. There should be an element of peer-review - either by individuals,
learned orgs or by 'open acclamation'. In my view, one of the most obvious
forms of approval is that specs, papers, code, etc. are actually used - SAX
falls into this category. It would, of course, be possible to use existing
organs (anything from W3 to IETF drafts to CompSci journals) but Henry and
I are keen on developing new forms of publishing. 

[In our own field (molecular and biological software) there are few good
places for the rapid publication of widely used molecular software or
specifications. Most publication tends to be considerably 'after the event'
and is often not for informing people but to create a formal record -
usually for 'academic currency'.]

Ideas welcome.


[wrt. Murray's comments on XCatalogs] I would support the idea of an IETF
draft in this instance. (Henry and I have been through this procedure :-).
In general, I'd suggest that there was an initial suggestion - possibly a
draft - on XML-DEV and that from that an IETF draft emerged. Although
XML-DEV has no formal standing with IETF (or anyone else) I think that the
ability to point to hypermailed discussion would show that the draft had
potential value and had been worked over.

Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
net connection
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS