[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <SimonStL@classic.msn.com>
- To: "Xml-Dev (E-mail)" <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jul 98 16:05:10 UT
Carl Hage proposed:
>Though it's not as important for AttValue to be an element, I think for
>improved extensibility and the ability to attach documentation, <AttValue>
>should be restored, with Doc? added, e.g.
>
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttDef (XSC:Doc?, XSC:More?, XSC:EnumerationValue*,
> XSC:AttValue?)>
>
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttValue Doc?>
I'd add XSC:More as well, of course...
Right now the AttValue is an attribute, not a subelement. This is handier for
typing, but less convenient for documentation. Opinions?
More to come...
Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
